WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Bitcoin halving: Everything you need to knowNicola Peltz cements the end of 'feud' with 'beautiful' motherDutch soccer club Vitesse docked points and relegated during probe of Russian ties to AbramovichUkraine, Israel aid bill on track as House pushes toward votesTaylor Swift channels her bridal Grammy look in Fortnight video teaserTesla recalling nearly 4,000 Cybertrucks because accelerator pedal can get stuckCaitlin Clark 'is set to sign eightEurope discards Arsenal and Liverpool shift focus to EPL title raceKarlie Kloss exudes confidence in a bold red midaxi dress as she attends starGoogle is combining its Android software and Pixel hardware divisions to more broadly integrate AI